Image from Being Liberal fan page/Facebook

WELCOME! Good to have you here.


You have power. Use it wisely. Make it matter.

At Lucy Left you're encouraged to leave comments, keeping this request in mind: Say what you mean and mean what you say, just don't say it mean. Lucy's not a fan of vitriol. This is a place to find information and opinion, a place to have a laugh now and then and to feel less alone in the political madness.

Be well, speak up for what is right and true (even if your voice shakes), and come back soon!

Saturday, August 17, 2013

The Snowden Situation—By Request

A friend said she'd been catching up on reading at Lucy and hadn't seen any posts about the Snowden/NSA situation.  She's right—I haven't written about Edward Snowden.  For one thing, I haven't known enough to offer an informed opinion on this complex issue.

 

On one hand, I keep hearing about the lack of transparency in our intelligence gathering; yet, isn't secrecy the core of what the "intelligence" agencies do and have always done?   Sources and methods need to be protected, as do agents (remember Valerie Plame).  And yet, we Americans like to believe our personal information is "private" and protected.  We like to believe it, even knowing that we're one google away from learning a whole lot about another person.  We can learn with one google or on Facebook as much as it appears the intelligence agencies have gathered on American citizens.  

 

Here are some thoughts:  I believe we're in trouble when high-clearance individuals are brought in as contract workers with no feeling of ownership in the work or connection to the agency.  High-security jobs like the one Edward Snowden was doing should not be outsourced or contracted.   I also believe there need to be changes in the FISA Court (which came about as a result of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act); apparently the court doesn't have the tools it needs to adequately monitor the NSA and overall intelligence gathering.   The other thing that has become clear is that Congressional oversight has been lacking; that also needs to change.   I understand it's impossible for the American people to know everything that's going on in the murky world of surveillance.  Checks and balances are sorely needed—that we know.  And we know these things because of Edward Snowden.

 

As for Snowden, I don't see him as a hero—nor as a traitor.  I can't know his motivation, but suspect he could have felt morally obliged to steal and reveal the secrets he has.   It doesn't appear he planned to profit from his actions.  I can't say for certain that what he did was foolish, although that thought has crossed my mind.  I wonder whether he expected the aftermath of his actions to go the way they have.   It's a complex thing to sort out, don't you think?

 

My friend was saying that she finds the situation complicated, too; however, she was feeling sad for this young man.  She said, "I think Snowden may be the loneliest person on earth, and it makes me sad for him because I continue to feel he was motivated by his own sense of what is right or wrong."

 

What are your thoughts, Lefties?  Share them in a comment if you will.


2 comments:

  1. I've been at least, if not more, confused as you. The contracting of services began with Bush-Cheney (as far as I know) and was out of control from day one. There is NO congressional oversight of anything that I'm aware of (except every item they can construe to make President Obama look bad). I'd like all contracting services to stop. Agree with your friend that Snowden is lonely - but I think it would take a loner to make the decision he did - hopefully, if he'd shared his intentions with others, he might have been dissuaded.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your thoughts on this. I think you're right: Maybe if he had shared his plan with someone else, he might have been dissuaded.

    ReplyDelete